fix(runtime): an image name cannot be read by the engine as an option #161
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility
all-platforms
area:agents
area:ai
area:chain
area:ci
area:client
area:daemon
area:p2p
area:project
area:protocol
area:runtime
area:storage
bug
chore
community
dependencies
discussion
discussion/Announcements
discussion/General
discussion/Ideas
discussion/Q&A
discussion/Show and tell
discussion/answered
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
i18n
infra
invalid
needs:decision
needs:hardware
paired
question
research
security
status:in-review
test
testing
tracking
wontfix
Barrier affecting people with disabilities
Run every platform's packaging and checks on this pull request, not only the three main ones
MCP server, skill, and thinking on the pool
Planner and model providers
Blockchain, SISY, verification
Continuous integration and build workflows
Desktop and web clients
sisyphusd coordinator, worker, scheduler
libp2p hosts, relays, discovery, connections between nodes
Project planning, roadmap, and governance
Protobuf schemas and RPC contracts
Workload execution and environments
Content-addressed storage, IPFS, Kubo, Cluster, S3, names, pinning
Something isn't working
Repository health, templates, Discussions, contributor experience
Updates to actions, Go modules or npm packages
Migrated from GitHub Discussions
GitHub Discussions category: Announcements
GitHub Discussions category: General
GitHub Discussions category: Ideas
GitHub Discussions category: Q&A
GitHub Discussions category: Show and tell
Q&A discussion with an accepted answer
Improvements or additions to documentation
This issue or pull request already exists
New feature or request
Good for newcomers
Extra attention is needed
Translations and right-to-left layouts
Build, CI, releases
This doesn't seem right
Waits on a decision from both owners
Waits on a machine we do not have yet
Built together by both maintainers, with co-authored commits
Further information is requested
Needs investigation or a design decision
Sealing, keys, access control, tokens, the security model
Built and in an open pull request; closes when it merges
Tests, test harnesses and the rehearsal
Roadmap and meta issues
This will not be worked on
type
Feature
A request, idea, or new functionality (GitHub issue type)
type
Task
A specific piece of work (GitHub issue type)
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Agents and thinking on the pool
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
No Assignees
rvnminers-A-and-N
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Sisyphus/Sisyphus#161
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Found while writing down the security model (#160).
The fault.
Container.Executeappended the job'simageto the arguments ofdocker rununchecked. An image beginning with a dash was parsed by Docker as an option, with the first word ofcommandtaken as the image. Anyone who could submit a job (a client of the pool, or an agent through the MCP server) could add mounts or privileges on every worker that ran it, so the read-only input,--userand--network nonecould not be relied on.The fix.
checkImagerefuses a name that is empty, begins with a dash, or has a space or control character in it. It is applied inSplit, when the job is submitted, and again inExecute, since a worker should not rely on its coordinator having checked.Also. The MCP server's
--imageslist only looked atcontainerjobs. It now looks at every step of agraph, at any depth, and refuses an image given as a reference to an earlier step's result.ask_planneris refused while images are listed, because the planner runs jobs of its own choosing through the node.Nodes running an earlier build as workers remain exposed to a coordinator or client that sends such an image; they need this build.